Papers
arxiv:2601.16211

Why Can't I Open My Drawer? Mitigating Object-Driven Shortcuts in Zero-Shot Compositional Action Recognition

Published on Jul 2
· Submitted by
Geo Ahn
on Jul 10
#3 Paper of the day
Authors:
,
,
,
,

Abstract

RCORE addresses object-driven shortcuts in zero-shot compositional action recognition by using co-occurrence prior regularization and temporal order regularization to improve compositional generalization.

Zero-Shot Compositional Action Recognition (ZS-CAR) requires recognizing novel verb-object combinations composed of previously observed primitives. In this work, we tackle a key failure mode: models predict verbs via object-driven shortcuts (i.e., relying on the labeled object class) rather than temporal evidence. We argue that sparse compositional supervision and verb-object learning asymmetry can promote object-driven shortcut learning. Our analysis with proposed diagnostic metrics shows that existing methods overfit to training co-occurrence patterns and underuse temporal verb cues, resulting in weak generalization to unseen compositions. To address object-driven shortcuts, we propose Robust COmpositional REpresentations (RCORE) with two components. Co-occurrence Prior Regularization (CPR) adds explicit supervision for unseen compositions and regularizes the model against frequent co-occurrence priors by treating them as hard negatives. Temporal Order Regularization for Composition (TORC) enforces temporal-order sensitivity to learn temporally grounded verb representations. Across Sth-com and EK100-com, RCORE reduces shortcut diagnostics and consequently improves compositional generalization.

Community

Paper author Paper submitter

TL;DR: We quantify how object-driven shortcuts sabotage compositional generalization in video understanding.

A model that has seen "Open Window" and "Close Drawer" should be able to recognize "Open Drawer"—an unseen yet plausible verb–object combination. But we found that when existing models fail, it's mostly a verb-collapse phenomenon: they get the object right and the verb wrong. The model simply assumes the verb that is most often paired with that object in training and thus fails to generalize to unseen compositions.

We show that these object-driven shortcuts are not a matter of insufficient model capacity or pretrained knowledge. They stem from two intertwined, structural problems: (i) sparse compositional supervision and (ii) the learning asymmetry between verbs and objects (objects are simply easier to learn than verbs). We prove this empirically, and we further propose a suite of diagnostic tools that measure exactly how far a model overfits to co-occurrence statistics.

Our diagnostic-driven fix—RCORE (Robust COmpositional REpresentations)—directly mitigates both root causes and delivers consistent gains in unseen-composition generalization across multiple benchmarks.

Sign up or log in to comment

Get this paper in your agent:

hf papers read 2601.16211
Don't have the latest CLI?
curl -LsSf https://hf.co/cli/install.sh | bash

Models citing this paper 0

No model linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2601.16211 in a model README.md to link it from this page.

Datasets citing this paper 0

No dataset linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2601.16211 in a dataset README.md to link it from this page.

Spaces citing this paper 0

No Space linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2601.16211 in a Space README.md to link it from this page.

Collections including this paper 0

No Collection including this paper

Add this paper to a collection to link it from this page.